Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies

Thanks for that clarification Ralph. My review was in fact based on a
reading of the Dec 3rd draft.

My apologies for the confusion,
//Ed

On Jan 8, 2008 1:47 PM, Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote:
> At 11:30 AM 1/8/2008 -0500, Ed Summers wrote:
>
> >Below is my (late) review of the Best Practice Recipes for Publishing
> >RDF Vocabularies [1].
>
> Ed, just confirming that you reviewed the 3 December editor's
> draft [2] that is intended to be the update and not the published
> WD that you cited ([1]).  (You referred to the editor's note on
> pre-existing libraries, which appears only in the editor's draft,
> so I'm reasonably confident that you did :)
>
> I just noticed that the wiki [3] had not had a link to the editor's
> draft that Jon posted in December [4].  It does now have that link.
>
> >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/draft-20071203
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0006.html
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 19:13:35 UTC