Re: XL namespace

On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:43:27PM +0000, Sean Bechhofer wrote:
>
>
> The resolution to 153 and 175 results in us using the original SKOS  
> namespace. I don't believe we have discussed the XL namespace in detail. 
> Should we move XL under 2004/02, e.g.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/xl
>
> or leave it as is?

Let's leave it as it is, I see no value in making a change to use 2004/02.

Cheers,

Al

>
> 	Sean
>
> --
> Sean Bechhofer
> School of Computer Science
> University of Manchester
> sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
> http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
>
>
>
>

-- 
Alistair Miles
Senior Computing Officer
Image Bioinformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology
The Tinbergen Building
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PS
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993

Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2008 11:23:36 UTC