W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > December 2008

Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-154]

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:55:53 +0000
Message-Id: <BF1355EE-D013-4AD7-B67B-6021E386BFB0@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

On 3 Nov 2008, at 20:25, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> I would be minimally satisfied if the RDF/XML document that  
> embodies the
> OWL portion of the SKOS semantics were to have comments (or SKOS
> comments) in it that referred back to the semantic sections of the  
> document, as in
> <!-- S1  	skos:Concept is an instance of owl:Class.  -->
> <owl:Class rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#Concept">
>   <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Concept</rdfs:label>
>   <skos:changeNote>
>     <rdf:Description>
>       <rdf:value>Initial description.</rdf:value>
>       <dc:creator>Sean Bechhofer</dc:creator>
>       <dc:date>2008-05-xx</dc:date>
>     </rdf:Description>
>   </skos:changeNote>
>   <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos"/>
>   <skos:definition xml:lang="en">An abstract idea or notion; a unit  
> of thought.</skos:definition>
>   <dct:issued>2008-05-xx</dct:issued>
> </owl:Class>


The latest version of the SKOS scheme:


now has comments as requested above. There is also a comment in the  
header outlining those conditions that are not explicitly captured in  
the schema. I hope this is satisfactory.

The schema will reside at the appropriate URI in the fullness of time.


Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 5 December 2008 11:04:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:54 UTC