- From: Vit Novacek <vit.novacek@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:06:44 +0100
- To: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the record of today's SWD WG telco [1] is now available... Plain text version given below [2]. Let me (and/or Ralph) know if there is any mess, incompletion or misinterpretation you'd like to change. Cheers, Vit [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-minutes.html [2] """ W3C <http://www.w3.org/> SWD WG 15 Apr 2008 Agenda <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0055.html> See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/15-swd-irc> Attendees Present Tom Baker, Quentin Reul, Clay Redding, Ralph Swick, Vit Novacek, Daniel Rubin, Ed Summers, Diego Berrueta, Guus Schreiber, Jon Phipps, Margherita Sini, Antoine Isaac, Ben Adida Regrets Sean Bechhofer, Alistair Miles, Michael Hausenblas, Simone Onofri Chair Tom Scribe Vit Contents * Topics <#agenda> 1. Admin <#item01> 2. SKOS <#item02> 3. RDFa <#item03> 4. recipes <#item04> 5. Vocab Management <#item05> * Summary of Action Items <#ActionSummary> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <TomB> Previous: http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html Admin <scribe> *ACTION:* Chairs to draft charter extension proposal for SKOS until July 1st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-swd-minutes.html#action01] *[CONTINUES]* tomb: ed & clay go on and add instructions related to f2f <Ralph> Washington F2F agenda <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/WashingtonAgenda> clay: writing up a page about logistics ready by tomorrow add it to wiki and post to list wifi should be working tomb: update list of F2F participants if needed ... edit wiki or drop a line <scribe> *ACTION:* Guus and Tom draft an agenda for the May f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html#action02] *[DONE]* SKOS <Ralph> SKOS Reference editors' update <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0062.html> [Alistair 2008-04-14] antoine: concerns related to semantics of OWL imports <Ralph> SKOS-XL & label relations <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0063.html> [Alistair 2008-04-14] antoine: implementation of imports may vary in OWL ... OWL spec is not clear in this respect ... we can say that we recommend OWL imports <Ralph> primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Apr/0056.html> [Alistair 2008-04-14] <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] *[DONE]* <scribe> *ACTION:* Guus to write primer text re: broaderGeneric and equivalence w/r/t subclass [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action08] *[CONTINUES]* <scribe> *ACTION:* Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10] *[CONTINUES]* - -> http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action06 antoine: relations between label objects unclear... alistair proposed reification n-ary relation ... solution: get all the possible patterns for this into the document ... don't make a preferred choice <scribe> *ACTION:* Antoine will review Alistair's proposals w/r/t the relationship between the existing solution and the extension [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action06] *[CONTINUES]* open skos issues <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 (Concept Coordination) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action09] *[CONTINUES]* <scribe> *ACTION:* Alistair to review Antoine and Guus' emails to move ISSUE-71 and -74 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action09] *[CONTINUES]* tomb: agenda for the f2f - document editors should propose a way how to make use of the f2f time ... look at the wiki and possibly change the agenda/topics RDFa <scribe> *ACTION:* Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] *[CONTINUES]* ben: small changes, but new editor's draft still needed ... mark working on that feedback would be welcome after the implementation and draft will be ready ben: get a draft out before the next meeting ... depends on the TF approving this ... primer draft looking pretty good, positive comments received ... this week incorporating small changes to the syntax ... primer draft by the next week guus: w.r.t. charter extension proposal - what should we plan? ben: let's be pesimistic ... would go to CR in june guus: depends on the implementation report ben: no need to be pesimistic about that <TomB> CR is just for implementation - for demonstrating that your spec can be implemented by two independent developers guus: the main conversation happens when you go from last call to CR <TomB> Guus: in OWL, from Last Call to CR - consider issues raised guus: in case of objections, can be a difficult discussion ben: once the editor's draft is ready, we'll re-notify the previously contacted places ... in pesimistic case CR end of june ... period can be short ... the implementations are already there guus: so that will be in the charter extension proposal then recipes <scribe> *ACTION:* Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] *[CONTINUES]* <scribe> *ACTION:* Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] *[CONTINUES]* Vocab Management Guus: we have 4 reviews ... all 4 agree it's worthwhile to publish. Editor's should respond to comments and indicate changes to the document ... if changes are major, may be a good idea to discuss with reviewers first Vit: one of the major points raised in the reviews concerns the Research Topics section ... I proposed options to Elisa; we could either remove it or shorten it to two or three sentences ... cite some references in case readers are interested ... Tom seems to prefer to drop it ... Ralph thought it interesting to keep ... shortening may be the right compromise Ralph: I'd be happy with shortening the Research Topics section to a couple of sentences Tom: one point I raised was a connection between this document and our discussion on the policies regarding the SKOS vocabulary ... issues with changes to the namespace and deprecated terms ... if we're going to discuss this in Washington then whatever consensus we reach in Washington should be recorded in this VM notes ralph: pretty much the same point as tom Ralph: I absolutely agree that this VM Note is the place to document our design rationale for the SKOS namespace changes ... will Vit and Elisa do that? Vit: I agree it should go in this document guus: suggestion for agenda next week ... distribute the preparation tasks for various SKOS issues for the f2f ... ask all the issue owners tomb: just walk through the issues and make sure they'll be covered guus: all the issues should have the proposal ready in two weeks from now ... 29 april would be ok tomb: next week we'll walk through all the issues guus: distribute all the related material on time tomb: every open issues? guus: at least top ten... guus: let's make an action for that for the next week tomb: meeting adjourned Summary of Action Items *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 (Concept Coordination) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action09] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Alistair to review Antoine and Guus' emails to move ISSUE-71 and -74 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action09] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Antoine will review Alistair's proposals w/r/t the relationship between the existing solution and the extension [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action06] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Chairs to draft charter extension proposal for SKOS until July 1st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-swd-minutes.html#action01] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Guus to write primer text re: broaderGeneric and equivalence w/r/t subclass [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action08] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10] *[PENDING]* *ACTION:* Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] *[DONE]* *ACTION:* Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] *[DONE]* *ACTION:* Guus and Tom draft an agenda for the May f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html#action02] [End of minutes] - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm> version 1.133 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>) $Date: 2008/04/15 17:45:28 $ """ - -- Vit Novacek SmILE group Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI) National University of Ireland, Galway Lower Dangan Galway, Ireland Tel: +353 91 495738 Fax: +353 91 495541 Web: http://www.deri.ie/about/team/member/vit_novacek/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIBO6zc7uyClWR0g8RAr4KAJ9ypr6d7MSlrymH+rCRQUdpfI43egCcCw9t hnd+IXneHIwGvF2fV+hNIKI= =rdAu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2008 18:07:29 UTC