- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:06:10 +0200
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <46838812.6060304@w3.org>
Mark, as I said: I am not sure about the usage of @role, I did not follow the details of that. I am happy to disregard @role for now. I also agree that rdf:type is important, so it is probably a good idea to give a shorthand (just like Turtle does). @isA sounds perfectly fine to me... Ivan Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > I also prefer a new attribute. > > The only thing I feel really strongly about is that we don't use @role > for rdf:type, since I think that will come back to bite us in the > future. So for me, that leaves two choices, use @class or use a new > attribute. > > I can live with using @class, but I do agree that it comes with some > baggage. I don't mean that from the point of view of some kind of > 'backlash', since I think people are using @class semantically already > (even without using microformats). What I mean is that I can easily > imagine people forgetting to put foaf:Person (for example) in the > class attribute on the containing element, since novice authors would > probably see it as 'I must set the CSS class to foaf:Person for this > to work'. > > I also believe that rdf:type is so important that it should be part of > the core RDFa attributes, that are independent of any host language. A > host language may have an additional way of doing this, and we might > even decide in the future to use @class in HTML after all. But by > having our own attribute, it means that there is a core way of marking > up rdf:type that is always there, no matter what language is the host. > > So to summarise; my preferred approach would be to leave @class > undefined for now--we can always come back to this in a future > version--and use @isA or something like that, to indicate the rdf:type > of something. > > Regards, > > Mark > > > > On 28/06/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> I am a bit uneasy with the usage of @class. _I know_ that the formal >> semantics of @class allows this type of usage, and I also know that the >> microformat community uses that trick, I still feel that usage @class is >> putting a semantics into the attribute that a lambda user would not >> expect. (And yes, I am also uneasy with the way the microformats reuse >> attributes like title, class, or abbr...). >> >> I would prefer to use a dedicated attribute if we need it (or simply >> stick to the rel="rdf:type", which is at disposal anyway). >> >> I must admit I am not fully familiar with the discussion behind @role to >> decide whether @role should be introduced in RDFa for XTHML1, too, to >> cover this usage, or whether a different @type or similar should be >> introduced. I guess this discussion should start _if_ ISSUE-3 is not >> resolved for @class >> >> Ivan >> >> P.S. Having said all that: I do not consider this issue as life >> threatening:-) Ie, resolving it quickly is probably more important than >> spending lots of time finding the best solution. >> >> Ben Adida wrote: >> > >> > Another issue up for discussion. >> > >> > ISSUE-3 >> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/3 >> > >> > The question is what @class and @role should yield in XHTML1.1+RDFa. We >> > don't have complete consensus on this (we specifically note Steven >> > Pemberton's worries about the reuse of the @class attribute), but the >> > current solution, as accepted in the Primer and in many use cases, >> is as >> > follows: >> > >> > @class yields rdf:type only if the value is namespace-qualified. @class >> > contains a space-separated list of values. Only those values which are >> > namespace-qualified yield rdf:type triples. >> > >> > @role does not exist in XHTML1.1, so it is not used here. In XHTML2, it >> > is expected to yield a triple with predicate xhtml2:role. >> > >> > +1 if you agree, otherwise email your disagreements and explanation. >> > >> > -Ben >> > >> >> -- >> >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 10:06:08 UTC