- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:57:06 +0200
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
+1 Cheers, Michael btw: also discussed in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/RDFCoverage ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Adida >Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:41 AM >To: RDFa; SWD WG >Subject: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification > > > >In our continuing effort to close issues, I want to bring up a few more >for discussion. We will attempt to close these by end of next week. > >ISSUE-1 >http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/1 > >This is about supporting reification. We had a proposal at some point >[1], but at this point there seems to be a consensus to stay away from >reification support, given that some don't even consider it part of the >RDF specification. > >The current proposal on the table, then, is to not support reification. >Please send +1 or disagreements ASAP! > >-Ben > > >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007 > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 06:54:41 UTC