W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [SKOS] test cases

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:03:41 +0100
Message-Id: <26189BF6-BECF-46F0-83AA-F87BC2608CB8@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>

On 26 Jun 2007, at 09:43, Antoine Isaac wrote:

>>> But of course in some contexts a SKOS implementation could denote  
>>> tools making use of SKOS (e.g. browser). Perhaps we should use  
>>> 'SKOS tools' to refer to the latter category.
>> Pinning down vocabulary is an excellent idea. I like the use of  
>> "tools" for browsers and the like. I'm not sure that I'd use the  
>> word "implementation" for an instantiation of the SKOS model  
>> though -- implementation to me has different connotations.
> I agree with trying to avoid the use of 'implementation'. But is  
> 'instantiation' clear enough for the creation of SKOS concept schemes?

I'm not sure. I propose that we put this on the agenda for a short  
discussion during next week's call (to give us some time to think  
about it).


Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 09:16:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:43 UTC