- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:05:07 +0200
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
On Thursday 21 June 2007 14:35, aisaac@few.vu.nl wrote: > PS: by the way if you are urgently interested in the POWDER thing > it's perhaps better if you anser the second part of my previous mail > ;-) Heh, ok! :-) On Wednesday 20 June 2007 23:27, aisaac@few.vu.nl wrote: > This problem is not trivial to understand: what does this > http://www.fosi.org/rdf/descriptions#just-nude stand for? Why would > it be different from the description of a SKOS concept using for > instance some SKOS notes and SKOS semantic relationships? In this > case you could just use a SKOS mapping link (well we have to define > them, so just tell your requirement ;) saying that your > http://my.opera.com/username/tag/nude is semantically equivalent to > http://www.fosi.org/rdf/descriptions#just-nude , couldn't you? Yes, I could, what I want to say in this case is that http://my.opera.com/username/tag/nude is semantically equivalent to http://www.fosi.org/rdf/descriptions#just-nude (or rather <http://repository.icra.org/generic#nudity> which is a stable URI for exactly this resource, however, its rdf:type is TBD.) However, the problem is that the UI our users see for the case of saying that the http://my.opera.com/username/tag/nude is semantically equivalent to http://repository.icra.org/generic#nudity is not different from saying that http://my.opera.com/username/tag/kjetil is somehow related to the resource me... So, that's the problem, I need something generic enough to say both these things. -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Semantic Web Specialist Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 13:05:16 UTC