Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification

Hi Ivan,

Just to be clear though, the proposal is that the profile is optional.
Are you ok with that?

Regards,

Mark

On 19/06/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> Ben Adida wrote:
> >
> > Issue #28:
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/28
> >
> > DanC asked us: "how does one follow one's nose to the RDFa specification
> > from an HTML+RDFa document?"
> >
> > I propose that we respond to this question by pointing to the DTD
> > declaration we now recommend for XHTML1.1+RDFa documents.
> >
> > I also propose that we specify an official W3C profile for XHTML1.1+RDFa
> > which would include a GRDDL transformation for XHTML1.1+RDFa. We should
> > encourage publishers to use this profile when it's possible, though we
> > should not to developers of RDFa consumers that this profile may not
> > always be present, since RDFa is built for copy-and-pasted, widgets, etc...
> >
> > Thoughts? Comments? Remember, send a note even if you simply agree!
> >
>
> I have been advocating an official profile for a while. Ie, I agree.
>
> Ivan
>
> > -Ben
> >
>
> --
>
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 09:36:52 UTC