- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 12:49:36 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:36:23AM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: > To add to this mutual clarification process: as said, nothing like a > "term" appears now in current SKOS, it only popped up in the discussion > because of loosely wording used in the proposals for solving the > RelationshipBetweenLabels issue. [and of course I share a great deal of > responsability for that :-(] Hence my will to replace"term"by > "Lexicalization" (or by anything more neutral than "term") in Guus' > proposal > (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels/ProposalThree) One problem is that "lexicalization" is not defined in the average desk dictionary. If I were to guess at it's meaning, out of this context, I'd have said "the process of lexicalizing", and I see that some linguists use lexicalization to refer to the process of making a word for a concept, but these meanings are misleading for what we want to say here. Given a choice between "lexicalization" and "term", I'd still go for "term" but agree we should try to find something more neutral. Tom -- Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 10:47:29 UTC