- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:48:07 +0100
- To: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
I would have a strong objection to migrating existing content to mediawiki, because a lot of the content uses moin-specific syntax which would be lost in the migration. Also the revision history is extremely valuable and referenced from emails. I would not object to having a new mediawiki instance in addition to keeping the existing moin instance, and starting new work on mediawiki. Cheers, Alistair. -- Alistair Miles Research Associate Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Guus Schreiber > Sent: 11 July 2007 10:41 > To: SWD WG > Subject: [Fwd: migrating our wiki platform to mediawiki] > > > Any objections from this group on migrating the Wiki platform? > Guus > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: migrating our wiki platform to mediawiki > Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:26:17 +0000 > Resent-From: chairs@w3.org > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:26:27 +0900 > From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> > To: chairs@w3.org > > > Dear W3C chairs, > > Through your staff contacts, and from some of you directly, > the W3C systems team received a steady flow of requests to > consider switching the engine running w3c wikis from moinmoin > to the mediawiki engine, notably for its section editing > capability, and for its semantic annotation plugin (semantic > mediawiki). > > Mediawiki is the engine used to run the wikipedia site, and > may be already familiar to many of you. > > > After careful evaluation, we concluded that the migration > would be possible but tricky. In particular: > * we should be able to keep the same URI space > * existing content in our wiki will be copied to the new engine > * it may not be possible to migrate revision history for all > the documents. > We would look into saving the revision history somewhere in > web space, for the record. > * user accounts look difficult to migrate. In the worst case, > all users would have to re-create accounts. In the "best" > case all users may have to reinitialize their password > * plug-ins may be migrated, if possible, on a case-by-case basis. > "Themes" are unlikely to be migrated. > > > Consequently, we would like to hear from you, if you are > chairing a group currently using a wiki on the moinmoin > platform, whether you would object to the migration to the > mediawiki engine, given the potential issues listed above. > > If possible, please answer within the next week if you have > any strong objection. > > We can not, yet, give any timeline for the migration, but > will have a better idea of a time scale after receiving your answers. > > Thank you. > For the W3C Systems Team, > -- > olivier > > > > > -- > Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science > De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands > T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 > Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 16:48:15 UTC