Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type

I'm in the 'instanceof' crowd too. :)

(Just back from a vacation, got some catching up to do.)

Best regards,
Niklas


On 7/17/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> Diego Berrueta wrote:
> > El mar, 17-07-2007 a las 09:06 +0200, Thomas Baker escribió:
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:00:46AM +0200, Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> >>>> Everyone else on the list: time to express an opinion on which
> >>>> attribute
> >>>> name you'd like, ASAP :)
> >>> I already opted for 'instanceOf' [1] ;)
> >> +1 'instanceof'
> >
> > +1 for "instanceof" too.
> >
> > IMHO, "isa" might introduce some confusion, because some communities use
> > "is-a" for subclassing, not instantiation.
> >
>
> That is a good point! Thanks Diego. I hereby withdraw any backing for
> 'isa' and join the 'instanceof' crowd...
>
> Ivan
>
>
> > Regards,
> >
>
> --
>
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:50:51 UTC