W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:35:39 +0100
Message-ID: <640dd5060707120135u12b3bb54ld84ccf73cca2a47a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

Hi Ben,

I think this could easily be left to a future version, so my vote
would be for that. :)



On 12/07/07, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
> There's one syntax issue we haven't talked about n a while that we
> should probably address in *some* form: how to express RDF containers
> and/or lists. In particular, how do we indicate a list of creators, or a
> list of licenses, or a list of authors in a paper.
> I wrote a proposal on RDFa containers a while ago:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-rdfa-containers
> but that assumed we would do RDF Bags and Sequences. I don't know yet if
> that's what we should support, or if we should just focus on lists,
> denoted [a,b,c] in Turtle.
> Input from anyone, in particular the SWD WG, would be very helpful! I
> think for XHTML1.1+RDFa, we should do the simplest thing that doesn't
> completely prevent us from encoding lists of some kind.
> In terms of implementation, the right direction is likely something
> using UL, OL, and LI, possibly involving @href/@resource on the LI, as
> we had expected @href everywhere in the original XHTML2-based proposal.
> -Ben

  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 08:35:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:44 UTC