W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [SKOS] on ISSUE-36

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:33:31 +0200
Message-ID: <468ACEBB.5050006@cs.vu.nl>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
CC: jphipps@madcreek.com, public-swd-wg@w3.org

Antoine Isaac wrote:


> Do you mean that proper solution for ISSUE-36 on ConceptScheme 
> containment (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36) would help 
> you remove your objection? I have the feeling somehow that we are 
> argueing over the use of BT as mapping links between different 
> vocabularies because we don't have a solution for ISSUE-36 (and, I 
> agree, this one might be hard to find). which bothers me a bit because 
> these problems seems to me slightly orthogonal...

About ISSUE -36 (although it is officially not open): 

I must admit that I have given up on solving this problem (which reoccurs in many forms) at the RDF/OWL level (as it currently stands). All RDF/OWL tools I use work with some form of naming a graph (typically through a quadruple instead of a triple format). I don't think this working group should try and solve this problem.

I therefore propose to POSTPONE this issue and indicate in our spec a text indicating how users are expected to solve this at the tool level.



Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 22:34:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:50 UTC