- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:18:39 -0500
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, ben@mit.edu
Hi, Here are my small comments, mostly editorial. Cheers, Antoine General comment: - In the code examples, it would be really nice to emphasize (bold?) the RDFa elements (that is, the xhtml tags and attributes) that are introduced and explained by the current section (property, content, rel,...), for pedagogical purposes Specific comments 2.3 "Note how the about attribute is inherited down the DOM tree hierarchy: the nearest ancestor with a declared about applies to declared structured data." The end of the sentence is a little bit difficult to understand, I think. 3.2 On abbreviation (removing the span) [perhaps this is not only editorial!] " The span element is actually not required. One can easily add the RDFa attributes to existing HTML elements, without adding a span:" -> Isn't it only possible when values of abbreviated triples do not have the same value? (e.g. same dc:creator and dc:publisher) 4.1 problem of literal and individual-ranged property The value of a dc:creator can be a literal or an individual, therefore this property can appear as value of both "rel" and "property" attributes. This seems not problematic but should be acknowledged, not to make the reader wondering wether this is a bug or a feature. 4.3 "The result of such syntax is an RDF bnode, an advanced topic which we skip in this Primer." -> and yet it is mentioned in 5.4
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:18:47 UTC