- From: Alistair Miles <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:43:46 -0500
- To: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, below is a few comments on the RDFa Use cases document [1]. - General Comments 1. What is the intended function of this document? Is it intended to give people a general idea of why and when RDFa might be useful? Or is it intended to provide the input to a design process? Normally a use cases document provides the backdrop to the design of a solution. However, because the use cases in this document present a fragment of HTML containing RDFa (as currently specified), the document presumes a solution. I suggest that, for each use case, a fragment of HTML be presented without any RDFa, and the set of RDF statements that you want to be embedded in the fragment be presented separately. This would give you the beginnings of a set of test cases. Also, note that because the document contains examples that use RDFa, if you change the design of RDFa at all you will have to go back and change your use cases document as well. 2. Use case 5 doesn't seem to be an RDFa use case. It is a use case for transferring fragments of (any) HTML between applications. The only new information it provides is that any RDF statements expressed as RDFa in such an HTML fragment should be properly preserved when the fragment is transferred. 3. Use case 6 doesn't seem to be an RDFa use case either, because it doesn't introduce any new requirements for RDFa. It just says, RDFa might be used in semantic wikis. - Specific Comments "chock-full" - is very culture specific language, suggest use something more neutral. "The expressed structure is closely tied to the data" - I don't know what this means. "copied and pasted" - copying and pasting is maybe too specific to UI style or user environment, should probably talk about transferring data between applications, where "copying and pasting" is a particular euphemism for doing this. "HTML chunks" - "chunks" is very informal terminology. Also title is not particularly informative. End review. [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/20070109/ -- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:44:21 UTC