- From: Alasdair Gray <agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:05:26 +0000
- To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- CC: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Alistair, All, This may be covered elsewhere, but in case it isn't there is relevance to the current discussion. Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > (ISSUE-39A) Should "grouping" constructs for mapping be included, and if so, what are their semantics? > > (ISSUE-39B) Is it necessary to have parallel vocabulary (skos:broader // skos:broadMatch etc.)? If not, how do you differentiate between intra-scheme vs. inter-scheme semantic links? > > (ISSUE-39C) What's the difference between "related" and "overlapping"? Is there enough precedent to justify a new property for "overlapping"? > > I would say there is a fourth issue here which is how can collections be involved in mappings, both within a vocabulary and across vocabularies. We have a use case for this with our astronomy vocabularies. (I'll try to send round details in the next couple of days.) Cheers, Alasdair
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 16:05:42 UTC