- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:01:01 +0200
- To: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Diego Berrueta <diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org>
All, Please note that the telecon for next week is canceled. Sorry I was not clearer about that during the meeting. Guus Diego Berrueta wrote: > The [1]record of yestersday's Semantic Web Deployment WG > telecon is ready for review. A text copy follows below. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html > > Topics > > 1. Admin > 2. SKOS > 3. Recipes > 4. Vocabulary Management > 5. RDFa > 6. AOB > > Summary of Resolutions > > RESOLUTION: accepted minutes of 17 Apr 2007 > > Summary of Action Items > > [NEW] ACTION: Diego to send the review of GRDDL spec [recorded in > [35]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action12] > > [PENDING] ACTION: Antoine to make a proposal about SKOS Use Case > document [recorded in > [36]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action03] > [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to provide feedback on GRDDL Last Call Doc > [recorded in > [37]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action11] > [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to send a summary of status of components of > specifications will be handled [recorded in > [38]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action10] > [PENDING] ACTION: Guus revise his ISSUE-26 proposal to account for > other options > [39]http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action07] > [recorded in > [40]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action07] > [PENDING] ACTION: TomB to start questionnaire on date for f2f > [recorded in > [41]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] > [PENDING] ACTION: Alistair to write up two alternatives for > representing Collections > [42]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action08] > [recorded in > [43]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action08] > [PENDING] ACTION: Elisa to provide outline of work to be done by Apr > 17 [44]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action01] > [recorded in > [45]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action11] > [PENDING] ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 > [46]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] > [recorded in > [47]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action09] > > [DONE] ACTION: Antoine, Jon, Daniel respond to the SKOS Use Case > reviews, target a decision to publish on 17 April > [48]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action02] > [recorded in > [49]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action04] > [DONE] ACTION: Diego to review GRDDL Last Call Doc. Discuss briefly > at next week's call [recorded in > [50]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action12] > > [DROPPED] ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation > requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal > values, and how to represent that in skos > [51]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] > [recorded in > [52]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action06] > [DROPPED] ACTION: Alan to write up the preferredLabel modelling > issue [53]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] > [recorded in > [54]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action05] > > The full text of the minutes follows. > > Semantic Web Deployment Working Group > > 24 Apr 2007 > > [2]Agenda > > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Apr/0030.html > > See also: [3]IRC log > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-irc > > Attendees > > Present > Diego Berrueta, Bernard Horan, Ralph Swick, Alistair Miles, > Simone Onofri, Antoine Isaac, Guus Schreiber, Daniel Rubin, > Tom Baker > > Regrets > Jon Philips, Vit Novacek, Elisa Kendall > > Chair > Guus Schreiber > > Scribe > Diego Berrueta > > Contents > > * [4]Topics > 1. [5]Admin > 2. [6]SKOS > 3. [7]Recipes > 4. [8]Vocabulary Management > 5. [9]RDFa > 6. [10]AOB > * [11]Summary of Action Items > _________________________________________________________ > > Admin > > PROPOSED to accept minutes of 17 April telecon: > [12]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html > > [12] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html > > RESOLUTION: accepted minutes > > tomb proposed next telecon May 8 > > <RalphS> Ralph: regrets for 8 May; meetings in Banff > > <scribe> ACTION: TomB to start questionnaire on date for f2f > [recorded in > [13]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] > [CONTINUES] > > [13] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action01 > > RalphS: we should revise this action > ... week of November 4th or the week of November 11th? > > SKOS > > Antoine: still waiting for answers > ... I don't know what should be done now > ... if we got positive answers, we could give a version a week after > > guus: we can discuss the comments in a later telecon. We need to > publish this > ... common way to respond to good documents is to make them optional > ... ping reviewers with the new version > > <RalphS> [14]Re: [SKOS] Review of SKOS Use Cases and Requirements > > [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Apr/0034.html > > <scribe> ACTION: Antoine to make a proposal about SKOS Use Case > document [recorded in > [15]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action03] > [CONTINUES] > > <scribe> ACTION: Antoine, Jon, Daniel respond to the SKOS Use Case > reviews, target a decision to publish on 17 April > [16]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action02] [DONE] > [recorded in > [17]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action04] > > [16] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action02 > > guus: propose to drop the actions on Alan > > <TomB> +1 to drop the actions > > <scribe> ACTION: Alan to write up the preferredLabel modelling issue > [18]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01] > [DROPPED] [recorded in > [19]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action05] > > [18] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01 > > <scribe> ACTION: Alan to write down the general documentation > requirements, in particular to those that are related to literal > values, and how to represent that in skos > [20]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] > [DROPPED] [recorded in > [21]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action06] > > [20] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09 > > guus: i've been very busy. Any volunteer (to tackle ISSUE-26)? > > <scribe> ACTION: Guus revise his ISSUE-26 proposal to account for > other options > [22]http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action07] > [CONTINUES] [recorded in > [23]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action07] > > [22] http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action07 > > <scribe> ACTION: Alistair to write up two alternatives for > representing Collections > [24]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action08] > [CONTINUES] [recorded in > [25]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action08] > > [24] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action08 > > guus: we should start making progress in the issues now > > aliman: i suggest relationship with OWL(-DL) > ... alan has been cc'ing me in a discussion about OWL 1.1 > > <RalphS> [Alistair, could you give us a pointer to the owl 1.1 > thread archive?] > > aliman: we should address mapping between concept schemes > ... it doesn't look difficult > > guus: i discussed with daniel 2 weeks ago > > aliman: should we have narrower, broader across schemes? > > daniel: some domains may use more specific properties > > guus: we have to give a guideline about equivalence > ... skos:skos:related is too general, skos:broader/narrower are too > specific > > aliman: what's the difference between skos:related and > skos:similarTo? > > guus: similarTo may be a subproperty of related > > aliman: how the retrieval applications should operate on these > properties? > ... the only way to define the semantics of these properties is > through operational uses > ... let's think about how retrieval applications should treat these > properties in order to determine their semantics > > Antoine: actually what you propose as operational semantics of > narrower/broader is just one interpretation > ... so we don't have the absolute definition of the properties > > aliman: you're absolutely right, but it should be at least "the most > reasonable" way to operationally use these properties > > guss: this operational semantics should be a guideline, not a > definition > > Antoine: this moves us to the compound concepts > ... issue about provenance seems difficult > > aliman: probably related with versioning > ... SKOS has no notion of version > > guus: (about versioning in SKOS) maybe we can't solve this in this > WG > > aliman: we should have this on the table anyway > > guus: I can't see anything specific to SKOS > > <aliman> I note that at leasting talking about versioning, both in > relation to SKOS specifically, and in relation to RDF and OWL > vocabularies more generally, is in our charter, within the > Vocabulary Management work area. > > Recipes > > <scribe> ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to Recipe issue 1.3 > [26]http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] > [CONTINUES] [recorded in > [27]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action09] > > [26] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14 > > Vocabulary Management > > <scribe> ACTION: Elisa to provide outline of work to be done by Apr > 17 [28]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action01] > [CONTINUES] [recorded in > [29]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action11] > > [28] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action01 > > RDFa > > guus: what's the status? > > RalphS: sorry, I couldn't attend to yesterday's meeting > > <scribe> ACTION: Ben to send a summary of status of components of > specifications will be handled [recorded in > [30]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action10] > [CONTINUES] > > [30] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action10 > > <RalphS> [31]record of yesterday's RDFa TF telecon > > [31] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/23-rdfa-minutes.html > > <RalphS> Simone: RDFa TF discussing issues with W3C validator > > <RalphS> ... compatibility of new requirements with current W3C > validator > > <RalphS> ... also discussing issue of literals, may be similar to a > literal issue in SKOS > > guus: (to Simone) please summarize through the list > > AOB > > <RalphS> [32]GRDDL spec review [Diego] > > [32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Apr/0029.html > > guus: let's suggest to add a paragraph about when to use GRDDL and > when to use RDFa > > RalphS: it's better to simply say that there are two alternatives > > guus: this may confuse readers > > <scribe> ACTION: Diego to send the review of GRDDL spec [recorded in > [33]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-swd-minutes.html#action12] > > <TomB> okay, is that a response from the SWD WG if Diego sends it? > > <RalphS> yes, thanks, Diego, for the GRDDL review > > <scribe> ACTION: Diego to review GRDDL Last Call Doc. Discuss > briefly at next week's call [recorded in > [34]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action12] [DONE] > > [34] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action12 > > <RalphS> Tom, I believe the record is sufficient to show that Diego > was asked to comment on behalf of the WG and this meeting discussed > his review briefly but we did not ask for a WG consensus > > No further business, meeting adjourned > > [37] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action11 > [38] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action10 > [39] http://www.w3.org/2007/03/20-swd-minutes.html#action07 > [41] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action01 > [42] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action08 > [44] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action01 > [46] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14 > > [48] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-swd-minutes.html#action02 > [50] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-swd-minutes.html#action12 > > [51] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09 > [53] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action01 > > [End of minutes] > _________________________________________________________ > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [55]scribe.perl version 1.128 > ([56]CVS log) > $Date: 2007/04/24 20:53:54 $ > > [55] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > [56] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > -- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 15:01:18 UTC