- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:00:03 +0200
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hello, If there is need for testing SKOS against specific vocabularies, we (STITCH project) can contribute with a number of vocabulary cases that will either nicely fit into the current framework, stretch it to its maximum or go quite beyond what it can do. Unsurprisingly, given my background, they come from cultural heritage (esp.libraries) world. The Dutch basic classification [1] is a general classification aimed at categorizing books against general disciplines. It is primary intented for Dutch organizations, but contains English labels (not in the pdf file, but in the electronic sources). This is a quite simple KOS. The Iconclass classification scheme [2] is a (large) classification scheme aimed at describing the content of images (with a bias towards european classic culture). Its structure is quite rich: especially, it allows for (controlled) extension by compound concepts (using kinds of qualifiers) and contains links between alternative labels, two acknowledged weaknesses [3] of current SKOS. I would also be interested (and therefore could experiment with) the UDC classification[4], which has been recently been mentioned a number of times on the SKOS mailing list. These vocabularies come from our ground material, they can be related to a hopefully wide range of use cases (at least in cases following pattern A and B from Alistair's slides). Which leads me to a question: would we have to partition our use cases? At a first glance I actually see two kinds of concerns: - "functional" cases, detailing systems that exhibit specific behaviours, like alistair's patterns and sean use cases) and - "representational" cases, presenting specific vocabularies with features SKOS should (or should not) enable one to represent It seems to me at that these two kinds of cases are quite orthogonal (e.g. we can search based on a complex vocabulary or a simple one) and therefore should be distinguished. Best, Antoine [1] http://www.kb.nl/vak/basis/bc04.pdf [2] http://www.iconclass.nl [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals [4] http://www.udcc.org/
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 21:00:17 UTC