- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:39:32 -0600
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 17:14 -0500, Ben Adida wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > The markup examples are an interesting teaser, but they raise > > various technical detail issues in my mind. I was going to comment > > on some of them, but then I realized that I'm actually pretty > > happy with the use case surrounding the markup, and filling > > in the missing markup and mime type details isn't going > > to improve the effectiveness of this document for its > > main purpose: to talk about use cases and requirements. > > We still would like to hear your questions, though, so please do keep > track of them. The search-by-author feature of the lists.w3.org search engine is my friend. :) I don't think any of my questions is new... I'm still interested in answers to these... following your nose from an RDFa document to the RDFa spec 03 Aug 2006 http://www.w3.org/2002/02/mid/1154630653.16297.162.camel@dirk.w3.org;list=public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf "Is property="acme:property/" allowed? How does one contract the URI http://acme.com/property/" http://www.w3.org/2002/02/mid/1151413051.16839.498.camel@dirk.w3.org;list=public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf Re: RDFa and its relationship to XHTML http://www.w3.org/2002/02/mid/1149773911.6515.152.camel@dirk.w3.org;list=public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf and so on. There was an issues list somewhere; I lost track. From this http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa_Use_Cases_and_Requirements document I see a link to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa . If the issues list is still in play, please link it from there or something so that I can check whether my questions are on the issues list somewhere. Or maybe my questions are answered in recent spec drafts. There's no particular rush. I'll stay tuned. > That said, I *just* whipped up these examples, so they > will likely change as we debug them, and you can hold off a few days > before spending much time on this. OK. > > Please consider moving the specific markup examples to a test > > collection or something. > > Yes, we definitely will begin to keep a more stable set of examples. > We're modeling our work on the recent GRDDL documents, though we will > likely not be quite as impressively coordinated. :) > -Ben -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 22:40:05 UTC