- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:25:39 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Soliciting input for "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies" Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:45:53 +0000 From: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl> CC: Semantic web list <semantic-web@w3.org> References: <45742735.7080401@cs.vu.nl> Guus, hello. On 2006 Dec 4 , at 13.48, Guus Schreiber wrote: > The Semantic Web Deployment Working Group [1, 2] is, amongst other > things, chartered to produce a revised and extended version of the > "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies" [...] > We would welcome input from the community on this, both through > comments on the first draft (especially if you've tried to use the > recipes) [4] and through people willing to join the SWD group for > working on this. Well, I've used one of the recipes, and it seemed to work perfectly successfully. It seemed to work so successfully that I worry that I'm missing something. Modulo a couple of @@TODO comments, it's not obvious to me that there's much need for the document to be `revised and extended'. One of the advantages of that document is its simplicity and straightforwardness -- you wouldn't want to compromise that. Is there an issues list outstanding? All the best (and thanks for the document), Norman -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Norman Gray / http://nxg.me.uk eurovotech.org / University of Leicester, UK -- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 17:29:17 UTC