- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:12:21 +0100
- To: Bernard Horan <Bernard.Horan@sun.com>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Bernard, > <snip> > Possibly. The requirements document requests examples of existing use > cases that motivate the development of SKOS, not for examples of where > SKOS is currently used. Perhaps it's worth considering asking if/how > respondents have considered using SKOS to augment/substitute their > current vocabularies? I had in fact thought about that, but I was not sure that this could help us defining the use case itself. Perhaps we could ask something like "Would you think of a SKOS version co-existing/replacing your current representation of the application vocabulary?" What would people here think of that? My personal opinion is that it is rather far from our core concerns, but I would not argue against if several people show clear interest for that. Cheers, Antoine
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 11:12:33 UTC