- From: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:32:23 -0400
- To: Wiebke Wagner <wiebkewagner@gmx.de>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Wiebke, The Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group is now closed. I am not sure that anyone officially monitors this mailing list anymore. I suggest that you contact the editors of the Time Ontology Note, Jerry Hobbs and Feng Pan. You may find their contact details linked from http://www.isi.edu/~pan/OWL-Time.html Good luck! Regards, Dave On 14 Jun2007, at 15:18, Wiebke Wagner wrote: > > Dear Time Ontology Working Group, > > I am working at present with your time ontology in owl for the > purpose of my studies and I couldn't figure out some questions: > > 1. Why has the property "inside" the domain of the class "interval" > und the range of the class "instant". Shouldn't it be the other way > around in the sence that an instant is inside an interval and not > an interval is inside an instant? > > 2. Why has the Property "hasDurationDescription" a domain of > "TemporalEntity" and not a domain of "Interval", because the > Duration of an "Instant" is alway zero, so why giving it this > property via inheritance? > > I am working with the version I found here: > http://www.isi.edu/~pan/damltime/time.owl > > Yours sincerely > Wiebke Wagner > > > -- > GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. > Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail > >
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 16:32:29 UTC