- From: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:37:16 -0400
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
That sounds fine to me, Ralph. Thanks for catching this. Regards, Dave On 27 Sep2006, at 21:36, Ralph R. Swick wrote: > > The OWL-Time draft does not explicitly give a namespace URI for > this ontology. Reference [8] points to a .owl file in Feng's part > of the isi.edu URI space. That file and the linked RDF/XML examples > use the namespaces > > http://www.isi.edu/~pan/damltime/time.owl# > http://www.isi.edu/~pan/damltime/timezone-us.owl# > > [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Time-Ontology#ref-8 > > I don't think the WG really intends those to be the proposed > namespace names and they probably won't fly with W3C > namespace naming policy anyway [2]. > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri > > I intend to change these to > > http://www.w3.org/2006/09/time# > http://www.w3.org/2006/09/timezone-us# > > I hope this is not controversial. I don't think the reviewers > noticed this. I think I may have noticed it last year but I can't > find evidence that I commented. I don't know how much > running code may exist that depends on those damltime URIs. > > Please respond quickly if you think we need to discuss this change. > > -Ralph > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 12:38:02 UTC