- From: Sini, Margherita (GILW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:29:57 +0100
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Dear all, We have implemented an RFDS based metadata-ontology using solution b) proposed by Torben (navigate online at http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/publications/fna/index.jsp?lang=en). All authors are attached to articles via an object-property (and so the other dc: elements, like subject, language, etc.). But I am interested to know more about 'puns' in OWL 1.1. Alan, I could not find references for this, can you give some? Thanks you in advance. Margherita Margherita Sini Information Management Specialist FAO viale Terme di Caracalla 00100 Roma - Italy phone: +39 06 57056805 email: margherita.sini@fao.org web site: http://www.fao.org/aims/ -----Original Message----- From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Rector Sent: 13 November 2006 22:32 To: Torben Knerr Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Re-using DC in OWL-DL - what's the best practice? Torben Hopefully, a better solution will be available with 'puns' in OWL 1.1. This is indeed a horrible problem. Alan On 11 Nov 2006, at 06:34, Torben Knerr wrote: Dear Group Members, I want to reuse the Dublin Core Metadata set for describing some individuals in my OWL-DL ontology. Therefore I am using the OWL-DL compatible version of DC available at http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/dc/dublincore.owl I would like to be able to refine the dc: properties (e.g. by saying that the range of dc:creator is a concept Person from my ontology). Unfortunately this doesn't work, because all dc: properties are defined as owl:AnnotationProperties, which can not be refined with domain/range, functionality, transitivty etc. Let's say I have a concept Document and another concept Person and want to express that a Document is created by a Person. What would you consider the best practice: a) reuse the dc:creator AnnotationProperty, without the possibility to further refine dc:creator (e.g. with domain/range) b) modify the dublincore.owl: change the dc AnnotationProperties to Object- or DatatypeProperties, in order to be able to further refine them (would this still justify the reuse of the DC namespace? Or woult it break the intended semantics of DC?) c) forget about re-using DC and define a new Object/DatatypeProperty according to my needs Best regards and thanks for your help, Torben ----------------------- Alan Rector Professor of Medical Informatics School of Computer Science University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL, UK TEL +44 (0) 161 275 6149/6188 FAX +44 (0) 161 275 6204 www.cs.man.ac.uk/mig www.clinical-esciences.org www.co-ode.org
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 18:39:06 UTC