- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:03:42 +0900
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
- Cc: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Hello SWD Working Group, These are comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-owl-time-20060927/ which I am sending on behalf of the i18n core Working Group. We are looking forward to discuss these with you. Regards, Felix - General: The i18n core WG has published a Working Group note on "Working with Time Zones", see http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-timezone-20051013/ . It would be great if you could consider adopting the following terminology, which is described in that note: * time zone: an identifier for a specific location or region which translates into a combination of rules for calculating the UTC offset. * zone offset: the difference in hours and minutes between a particular time zone and UTC * ID for a time zone: necessary for a time zone sensitive calendar system. Although you use both the terms "time zone" and "zone offset", we think that a section with clear definitions would be beneficial. - The translation of durations between various country / region specific calendars might become difficult with your design of durations. An example: translating a 1 month duration into another calendar, for example, gets hard, since "1 month" is not a fixed number of days in either the source or target calendar. - The "Olson time zone database" is a common source for time zone IDs. See http://www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm for more information. It would be great if you could refer to that data base and describe how your ontology relates to it (has it more information, less / the same?). See sec. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-timezone-20051013/#d2e226 .
Received on Friday, 10 November 2006 14:03:58 UTC