- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:55:18 +0900
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi, This is a QA Review comment for "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies" http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/ Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:48:26 GMT 1st WD "Choosing a recipe" http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/#choosing This section will benefit from a summary table of all cases, it will make the prose lighter by just explaining what are the different cases. A benefit analysis for each case would be good too. Why? When? hash slash namespace namespace ============================================================ machine processable RDF recipe 1 recipe 2 (PURL) recipe 1a recipe 2a ------------------------------------------------------------ RDF and Single HTML document recipe 3 recipe 4 (PURL) recipe 3a recipe 4a ------------------------------------------------------------ RDF and Multi HTML documents recipe 5 recipe 6 (PURL) recipe 5a recipe 6a ============================================================ Btw there's a typo in the section recipe 5, I think it's "If you are using a HASH namespace. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 02:55:31 UTC