- From: Mark van Assem <mark@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:32:40 +0300
- To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- CC: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jacco, Thanks for you consent. The publication was accepted conditionally: only if the URIs work. As we speak Ralph Swick is working on computing the CBD's and putting them in W3C space. Cheers, Mark. Jacco van Ossenbruggen wrote: > Guus Schreiber wrote: >> [NEW] ACTION: Guus get Jacco to mail explicit consent to publish >> WordNet WD [recorded in >> http://www.w3.org/2006/05/08-swbp-minutes.html#action14] > Guus, I already gave explicit consent in the 24 April teleconf, see > http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#item06. > > But I'd be happy to repeat that: please go ahead with publishing this as > a WD. > > Jacco > > PS: I missed the discussion on the recipes, but I noticed that the > example URIs given still resolve in a 404 error, try for example: > http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-bank-noun-1 > > Is this going to be resolved before publication? If not, the draft > should make a disclaimer for sentences such as "WordNet can also be > queried on line by performing HTTP GETs on the URIs described below." > > But this is not a show stopper for me. > > > > > > > -- Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 09:33:33 UTC