Re: [WNET] Schemas online

Thanks Mark. Re: Protege load, just remove from the file the list of 
properties that are later reintroduced as object properties (also, I 
don't see the need to introduce them as properties, and then as 
object properties):

<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;attribute" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;causes" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedBy" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedByUsage" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedByRegion" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;classifiedByTopic" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;entails" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;gloss" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;hyponymOf" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;lexicalForm" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;meronymOf" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;substanceMeronymOf" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;partMeronymOf" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;memberMeronymOf" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;sameVerbGroupAs" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;similarTo" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;synsetId" />
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&wn20schema;tagCount" />

Moreover, the object proeprty "similarTo" is symmetric, then at least 
we should indicate its inverse as being the same.

Cheers
Aldo

At 16:37 +0300 10-05-2006, Mark van Assem wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The schemas for WordNet Basic and Full are online [1]. They 
>validate/load in the W3C RDF Validator [2], the WonderWeb OWL 
>validator [3], Triple20 [4] and SWOOP [5]. They do not load in 
>Protege Full 3.2 Beta [6], for a reason I do not understand.
>
>A few remaining questions/comments:
>
>- I used XML Schema Datatypes also for e.g. the gloss and 
>lexicalForm properties, but I can recall that when properties have 
>an XSD as range then the actual glosses and lexical forms are not 
>supplied with the XML lang attribute. If this is correct, I should 
>probably change to rdfs:Literal?
>
>- there are two properties that are subPropertyOf rdfs:label / 
>rdfs:comment. The OWL validator complains that the rdfs properties 
>should be DatatypeProperties. Is this an issue?
>
>- I have not cleaned the rdfs:comments in the schema files yet.
>
>Cheers,
>Mark.
>
>[1]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/schemas/
>[2]http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
>[3]http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator
>[4]http://www.swi-prolog.org/packages/Triple20/
>[5]http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOP/
>[6]http://protege.stanford.edu/download/registered.html
>
>
>Mark van Assem wrote:
>>
>>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>A new version of the WordNet draft can be found at [1] for 
>>consideration for First Working Draft status at tomorrow's telecon.
>>
>>The main differences with the previous [2] draft are (a) new 
>>proposal for URIs as discussed on the list; (b) all material on 
>>indirection and versioning is moved to the Issues list.
>>
>>The RDF will be made available a.s.a.p. when the conversion program 
>>has been adapted to the changes in the Draft and a service has been 
>>set up at the W3C to serve CBD's for the WN URIs as described in 
>>the Draft.
>>
>>With regards,
>>Mark.
>>
>>[1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion-20062304
>>[2]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion-20060403
>>
>
>--
>  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
>        markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark


-- 



Aldo Gangemi
Research Scientist
Laboratory for Applied Ontology
Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technology
National Research Council (ISTC-CNR)
Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy
Tel: +390644161535
Fax: +390644161513
aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it
http://www.istc.cnr.it/createhtml.php?nbr=71

Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 15:40:25 UTC