- From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:01:30 -0800
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- CC: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@KSL.Stanford.EDU>, SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Guus and all, >OEP > [1] value partition: Note, final > [2] classes as values: Note, final > [3] n-ary relations: WD, move to Note > > This is obviously very close, and we should certainly be able to accomplish this. > [4] part-whole: ED, move to Note > > This needs some work, but again, is quite doable. > [5] QCRs: ED, move to Note > > With your help, this also seems doable to me. > [6] semantic integration: ED, move to WD > > I think this is right, but I'll check with Mike and Chris to see if they think it could be finalized more quickly. > [7,8] time/zone ontology: ED, move to WD > This I agree with as well. I'll check with Feng to see where things stand, but think this is reasonable given the amount of discussion to date. Best, Elisa Guus Schreiber wrote: > Elisa, Deb, > >> ACTION: Guus check with Elisa and Deb on which remaining OEP >> notes are feasible to complete by 1 May >> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/06-swbp-minutes.html#action05] > > > Would it be possible for you to comment on the expected status by May > 1 of the various OEP documents (see the list in my earlier message [1]). > > Wrt my own role: > - I'm assuming my action to review the time note is concerning a new > upcoming draft, right? > - I'm willing to do the edit work for the QCR note. > > Best, > Guus > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Mar/0060.html
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 18:02:52 UTC