- From: Feng Pan <pan@ISI.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:58:14 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, hobbs@ISI.EDU
Hi Dan, Thank you for your comment. The redundant equivalentClass will be removed in the next edition of the time ontology note. Thanks! Feng Quoting Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>: > > In > http://www.isi.edu/~pan/SWBP/time-ontology-note/time-ontology-note-3rdEd.html > > I see: > > :TemporalUnit > a owl:Class ; > owl:equivalentClass > [ a owl:Class ; > owl:oneOf (:unitSecond :unitMinute :unitHour :unitDay > :unitWeek :unitMonth :unitYear) > ] . > > It means pretty much the same thing if you just write: > > :TemporalUnit > a owl:Class ; > owl:oneOf (:unitSecond :unitMinute :unitHour :unitDay :unitWeek > :unitMonth :unitYear). > > > Likewise you can shorten... > > :TemporalEntity > a owl:Class ; > rdfs:subClassOf :TemporalThing ; > owl:equivalentClass > [ a owl:Class ; > owl:unionOf (:Instant :Interval) > ] . > > to just... > > :TemporalEntity > a owl:Class ; > rdfs:subClassOf :TemporalThing ; > owl:unionOf (:Instant :Interval). > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Friday, 30 June 2006 13:59:25 UTC