- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:13:38 -0500
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
In
Time Ontology in OWL
W3C Editor's Draft 18 May 2006
http://www.isi.edu/~pan/SWBP/time-ontology-note/time-ontology-note-3rdEd.html
I see this example...
[[
For example, duration of 15 days, 5 hours and 20 seconds is represented
in iCalendar as P15DT5H0M20S, which can be represented in the time
ontology as:
:duration
a :DurationDescription ;
:seconds 20 ;
:hours 5 ;
:days 15 .
]]
That description needs all the other fields filled in, no? Otherwise,
it could be that :duration :years 2, which is very different
from P15DT5H0M20S.
Also, that example suggests that :duration is in the same
namespace as :seconds, :hours, and :days. I suggest you
distinguish terms from example data from terms in the time ontology.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 30 June 2006 02:13:44 UTC