Re: RDFa and its relationship to XHTML

Is this it?

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12

If so, http://svn.rdflib.net/trunk/ revision *784* has a fix for those
(and so does my website http://torrez.us/rdfa).

-Elias

Elias Torres wrote:
> Do you mean I have to read the HTML spec too? ;-)
> 
> I just read the RDFa syntax document and did my best to parse it out.
> I guess I'll look for reserved HTML rel values and ignore those. Any
> other gotchas?
> 
> -Elias
> 
> On 6/8/06, Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>>
>> > I was assuming, quite dangerously, that Elias's code to implement
>> > RDFa is correct. I now understand that it's not quite there yet.
>>
>> More importantly, the proposal I've made is not quite there yet :)
>>
>> Elias's code is actually quite far along, but we haven't spec'ed the
>> default XHTML hGRDDL, so I take full responsibility for this gap
>>
>> I do have strong hope that hGRDDL will help the various metadata-
>> embedding communities bridge many of the differences between the
>> various schemes (and I'm open other names than hGRDDL, btw, if you or
>> others feel that it doesn't fit.)
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>>
> 

Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:29:50 UTC