- From: Mark van Assem <mark@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:50:56 +0300
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Ralph, The following URI in the Draft [1] gets me a "We're sorry but the link you tried to access is forbidden." http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/wordsense-bank-noun-1 although if I look in the file the data is there <wn20schema:NounWordSense rdf:about="&wn20instances;wordsense-bank-noun-1" rdfs:label="bank"> <wn20schema:tagCount>883</wn20schema:tagCount> <wn20schema:word rdf:resource="&wn20instances;word-bank"/> </wn20schema:NounWordSense> Something wrong with the file permissions? For the following URI I get a "sorry not found" http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/schema/participleOf We probably did not think about providing CBDs for the schema entities. Should we? Cheers, Mark. Ralph R. Swick wrote: > I won't be able to attend a WG telecon this coming Monday. > > Regarding: > > RESOLUTION: We publish 23 April Wordnet draft on two conditions: > 1. Mark and Ralph make URIs work in W3C space; 2. Reviewers > send explicit consent to the list. > -- http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#item06 > > Mark and I have completed condition 1 as of last weekend > (with help from Ted Guild of the W3C Systems Team) and > condition 2 was previously completed. > > I have submitted the required "transition request" to publish > the first public working draft [1]. I expect we will be able to > publish this document some time next week. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2006AprJun/0156.html > > Regarding: > > "request ownership change of remaining [MM] documents" > From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl> > Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:04:46 +0200 > -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006May/0068.html > > I fully support formally turning over responsibility for evolution of > all the MMTF documents to the Multimedia Semantics XG. > > My preference and the preference of Steve Bratt, as Incubator > Activity Lead, is to freeze the documents at [2,3,4,5] after adding > a Status notice near the top notifying readers that these versions > are frozen and directing them to the XG home page (or directly > to copies of these documents in XG space [6]) which the XG > then revises as it pleases. If this proposal does not satisfy > the Working Groups' preference then we can discuss. > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/interop.html > [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Tools.html > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Vocabularies.html > [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Resources.html > > [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/ > > -Ralph > > > -- Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 14:52:38 UTC