- From: Mark van Assem <mark@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:50:56 +0300
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Ralph,
The following URI in the Draft [1] gets me a "We're sorry but the link
you tried to access is forbidden."
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/wordsense-bank-noun-1
although if I look in the file the data is there
<wn20schema:NounWordSense rdf:about="&wn20instances;wordsense-bank-noun-1"
rdfs:label="bank">
<wn20schema:tagCount>883</wn20schema:tagCount>
<wn20schema:word rdf:resource="&wn20instances;word-bank"/>
</wn20schema:NounWordSense>
Something wrong with the file permissions?
For the following URI I get a "sorry not found"
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/schema/participleOf
We probably did not think about providing CBDs for the schema entities.
Should we?
Cheers,
Mark.
Ralph R. Swick wrote:
> I won't be able to attend a WG telecon this coming Monday.
>
> Regarding:
>
> RESOLUTION: We publish 23 April Wordnet draft on two conditions:
> 1. Mark and Ralph make URIs work in W3C space; 2. Reviewers
> send explicit consent to the list.
> -- http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#item06
>
> Mark and I have completed condition 1 as of last weekend
> (with help from Ted Guild of the W3C Systems Team) and
> condition 2 was previously completed.
>
> I have submitted the required "transition request" to publish
> the first public working draft [1]. I expect we will be able to
> publish this document some time next week.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2006AprJun/0156.html
>
> Regarding:
>
> "request ownership change of remaining [MM] documents"
> From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:04:46 +0200
> -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006May/0068.html
>
> I fully support formally turning over responsibility for evolution of
> all the MMTF documents to the Multimedia Semantics XG.
>
> My preference and the preference of Steve Bratt, as Incubator
> Activity Lead, is to freeze the documents at [2,3,4,5] after adding
> a Status notice near the top notifying readers that these versions
> are frozen and directing them to the XG home page (or directly
> to copies of these documents in XG space [6]) which the XG
> then revises as it pleases. If this proposal does not satisfy
> the Working Groups' preference then we can discuss.
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/interop.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Tools.html
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Vocabularies.html
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Resources.html
>
> [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/
>
> -Ralph
>
>
>
--
Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 14:52:38 UTC