- From: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:39:57 -0400
- To: Feng Pan <pan@ISI.EDU>
- Cc: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, Jerry Hobbs <hobbs@ISI.EDU>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Thanks, Feng! Ralph: I think the ball is in your court to set up the poll. Please advise if I can help in any way. Regards, Dave On 27 Jul2006, at 09:41, Feng Pan wrote: > Hi David, > > I have just received an email reply from Jerry. We both agree to > accept your > suggestion to merge the Time Zone document with the Time Ontology > document as > an appendix. > > Thanks! > > Feng > > Quoting David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>: > >> Hi Feng, >> >> On 25 Jul2006, at 10:51, Feng Pan wrote: >>>> Perhaps (as someone else suggested) the Time Zone document >>>> could be merged with the Time Ontology document as an appendix? >>>> What do you think, Feng? >>> >>> I think I will need to ask Jerry about it after he's back, but Chris >>> summerized it very well in [4] why we decided to split those into >>> two: >>> >>> "Feng decided to split the notes into two, one describing the time >>> ontology >>> and another describing just time zones, since they are actually >>> broken >>> into two ontologies anyway. I agree with Feng & Jerry that this >>> makes >>> sense, as the time zone ontology is usable by itself, without >>> having to >>> understand the time ontology." >> >> We understood that decision at the time, but the time zone work will >> now be abandoned (or picked up by another group prior to publication) >> unless it is folded in. This is the last chance to get anything >> published from SWBPD. In fact, the closure of the group is waiting >> on it! >> >> Please let us know whether you can fold in the time zone draft as an >> appendix or would prefer not to publish it at all at this time. >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 19:40:22 UTC