Re: [OEP] New edition of time ontology editor's draft on 18 May 2006

Hi David,

Thank you for the information. I think Jerry will be back in early August. Is it
possible to wait for Jerry's reply on this?

Thanks!

Feng

Quoting David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>:

> Hi Feng,
> 
> On 25 Jul2006, at 10:51, Feng Pan wrote:
> >> Perhaps (as someone else suggested) the Time Zone document
> >> could be merged with the Time Ontology document as an appendix?
> >> What do you think, Feng?
> >
> > I think I will need to ask Jerry about it after he's back, but Chris
> > summerized it very well in [4] why we decided to split those into two:
> >
> > "Feng decided to split the notes into two, one describing the time  
> > ontology
> > and another describing just time zones, since they are actually broken
> > into two ontologies anyway.  I agree with Feng & Jerry that this makes
> > sense, as the time zone ontology is usable by itself, without  
> > having to
> > understand the time ontology."
> 
> We understood that decision at the time, but the time zone work will  
> now be abandoned (or picked up by another group prior to publication)  
> unless it is folded in.  This is the last chance to get anything  
> published from SWBPD.  In fact, the closure of the group is waiting  
> on it!
> 
> Please let us know whether you can fold in the time zone draft as an  
> appendix or would prefer not to publish it at all at this time.   
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 15:34:31 UTC