- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:28:18 -0400
- To: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
At 03:42 PM 5/25/2005 -0700, Uschold, Michael F wrote: >This is a matter of personal style preference and there is a tradeoff. yep, and I'm generally willing to accept the preference of whomever steps forward to be the editor(s) of any given document. >For readers that DO like to read notes, it is disruptive to have to flip >several pages forward to find the notes and then back to the text (I'm >in this group). And it's frustrating that HTML printing support doesn't make it easy to have footnotes on the page where they are referenced. (As an inveterate reader of notes myself, I find that my mental flow is interrupted much less if I can glance at the bottom of the page and back rather than flipping to endnotes.) >2. Does the W3C ... have a position on this? Nothing on this topic is documented in W3C Manual of Style [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/ >3. If not, should we? I think we have more important debates with which to occupy our time ;)
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 17:29:03 UTC