- From: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:17:12 -0400
- To: Libby Miller <libby@asemantics.com>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Libby, et.al. I've been thinking about the ADTF maintained list of applications and demos and I have a couple of comments. There are far more RDF [1] and OWL [2] implementations out there that are mentioned on the implementation pages. Ideally, I'd like to link from these implementation pages back to the ADTF maintained list of applications and demos. More specifically, from each of these implementation pages, I'd like to link to the demos / applications that use the corresponding standards. So in essences, it would be nice to have this organizable by the standards in which the demos and applications use. Earlier this week, I ran a Roundtable discussion at the BioIT conference about Semantic Web and Life Sciences. There was a strong request / desire to be able to select Semantic Web applications that were related only to Life Sciences (and further sub-divide into additional specificity). From these and similar conversations I've had with others, it would be nice to have these applications and demos organizable by domain as well. From your home page [3], I see the current proposal (which makes a lot of sense to me) is in part to decentralize some of these project descriptions and help people create DOAP files. DOAP however, in and of it self is not enough for organizing the projects in different ways as I described above so some additional work (e.g. additional predicates, SKOS declarations of domain topics, standards, etc.) would have to be done. I'm curious how near the functionality described above is within the scope of your group? [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/ [3] http://esw.w3.org/topic/ SemanticWebBestPracticesTaskForceOnApplicationsAndDemos -- eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/ semantic web activity lead http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ w3c world wide web consortium http://www.w3.org/
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 13:17:17 UTC