- From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 20:21:01 -0400
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
On May 19, 2005, at 8:05 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdf-in-xml.html is last updated two years > ago, again discussing essentially non-issues like backwards-compati- > bility, character entities, validation, etc. The current dominant > position that "The RDF MUST NOT have to be reformatted from RDF/XML" > is interesting though, clearly RDF/A fails to meet that requirement > (and some others) ... That document was updated a long time ago, though the links apparently were not. That's my fault. Here's the most current version: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2004-10-12-tf.html However, your approach in this discussion seems disingenuous. All of these issues have been *publicly* discussed in our forums many times. None of this is new. The reasons here have been clear for a while. I'm going to have to agree with Mark here: you're not going to be convinced. You're opposed to the goal and thus to the solution. That's fine, but we have an important charter here that we need to fulfill. -Ben
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 00:21:03 UTC