- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:57:33 -0600
- To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>, Brian McBride <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 17:04 +0100, Enrico Franconi wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#bnodeRef > > > > We'll need new information in order to re-open bnodeRef > > and consider designs. > > Aren't you happy of the lengthy discussion in the SWBP WG I was > mentioning? I don't see that it provides any information that the DAWG didn't consider in making its decision on bnodeRef, no. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 19:57:54 UTC