- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:58:55 +0000
- To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- CC: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, schreiber@cs.vu.nl, mark@cs.vu.nl, Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr
Jacco van Ossenbruggen wrote: > I think that would be fine. In my opinion (Dave Booth may disagree) the > 'rdf' in the namespace also makes the use of hash URIs (as used now in > the conversion) OK. But for me, the most important thing is that the > namespace is _stable_. How big is the file if you use hash URIs? Isn't the size a showstopper for hashes in this application? I had always believed that this was one of the primary examples why hash URIs were not the only true way. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 11:02:17 UTC