W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > December 2005

Re: [WN] Fwd: WordNet Namespace

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:58:55 +0000
Message-ID: <439EA96F.4050306@hpl.hp.com>
To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
CC: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, schreiber@cs.vu.nl, mark@cs.vu.nl, Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr

Jacco van Ossenbruggen wrote:

> I think that would be fine. In my opinion (Dave Booth may disagree) the 
> 'rdf' in the namespace also makes the use of hash URIs (as used now in 
> the conversion) OK. But for me, the most important thing is that the 
> namespace is _stable_.

How big is the file if you use hash URIs?
Isn't the size a showstopper for hashes in this application?

I had always believed that this was one of the primary examples why hash 
URIs were not the only true way.

Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 11:02:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:15 UTC