Re: [WN] Fwd: WordNet Namespace

Jacco van Ossenbruggen wrote:

> I think that would be fine. In my opinion (Dave Booth may disagree) the 
> 'rdf' in the namespace also makes the use of hash URIs (as used now in 
> the conversion) OK. But for me, the most important thing is that the 
> namespace is _stable_.

How big is the file if you use hash URIs?
Isn't the size a showstopper for hashes in this application?

I had always believed that this was one of the primary examples why hash 
URIs were not the only true way.


Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2005 11:02:17 UTC