- From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:53:27 -0400
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
I am (finally) working on incorporating the review comments in the next version of the simple parts note, and am finding this ridiculous triple notation a real obstacle for understanding and writing the OWL code. I'm not sure why everyone has been using it in these notes - was it just a personal preference? The OWL abstract syntax was specifically designed to be easy to read/type for humans - I am going to switch the examples to that, at least for this note. -Chris Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532 Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455 Email: welty@watson.ibm.com Web: http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2005 02:53:35 UTC