- From: Phil Tetlow <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:37:32 +0100
- To: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Maybe I’m missing a trick here, but I’ve just read the XHTML 2.0 proposal metadata sections and have come away feeling somewhat disappointed. If I have got this right, the idea is to include a fixed set of new tag properties to allow specific types of in-line contextual ‘metadata’ augmentation? Although I appreciate that a primary goal of XHTML is human readability, I don’t necessarily think that this need follow for the application of ‘metadata’ in XHTML. Hence I consider the addition of a fixed set of additional tag properties to be somewhat restrictive. Instead – as I have already briefly discussed with Danbri – I favour a more extensible scheme, more closely related to cascading style sheets. Using this approach multiple metadata properties could be grouped and reused for fragment, or document, classification and enhancement. As the term ‘style’ seems somewhat inappropriate when applied to metadata, I currently prefer to think about collections of metadata for such purposes as ‘Aspects’. In the same manner as current CSS standards, Aspects could either be implemented as in-line sections within an XHTML document or referenced externally. Where XHTML has a specific requirement for the application of metadata, e.g. <link rel=”index” resource=”../index.htm”/>, reservation of a specific XHTML metadata namespace would allow browsers to interpret qualified properties in exactly the same way as fixed tags within the core language, e.g. <XHTMLMeta:rel> <XHTMLMeta:reltype>index<XHTMLMeta:reltype> <XHTMLMeta:rawresource>../index.htm<XHTMLMeta:rawresource> <XHTMLMeta:rel> I am currently experimenting with this type of approach to allow ‘functional styling’ and resource aggregation using descriminant Description Identification (apologies Danbri, if I have incorrectly quoted the latest terminology for ‘smushing’!) Phil Tetlow Senior Consultant IBM Business Consulting Services Mobile. (+44) 7740 923328
Received on Friday, 1 October 2004 15:34:59 UTC