- From: Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:04:30 +0100
- To: "Alistair Miles" <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Alistair, It was good to meet you in Bristol and I look forward to working with you on the RDFTM Task Force. Hopefully it will be approved during the Thursday telecon. I haven't had time to study the SKOS spec yet, but I know that you have a property for subjectIndicator in there. I just want to give you a heads-up that my current thinking is that having a special property may not be the optimal way of adding subject indicators (and hence Published Subjects) to RDF. I am tending toward the idea that a *class* defining the concept of "information resource" (as a subclass of "resource") may be a better way to go. This is of course one of the issues that needs to be addressed in RDFTM but I thought I'd let you know now in case your deadlines for SKOS require us to try and get that discussion going immediately. Best regards, Steve -- Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> Chief Strategy Officer, Ontopia Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps 1.0)
Received on Monday, 15 November 2004 16:04:53 UTC