- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:10:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "'public-swbp-wg@w3.org'" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Looks like a good plan to me. I agree that it is important to have stuff that covers the entire spec (in part this is a good test of it. If you find documentation that seems like it's descriing something odd, it quite possily is). Some very rough thoughts aout the Wiki Page: Break out the RDF into seperate pieces that you can discuss one at a time - see the approach in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/talks/200311-earl/all which boils down to about a single page for for enough to make stuff work (the rest is advanced thoughts and optimisations). So each entry for the term (term, narrower terms, etc) would have a few lines describing how to encode that piece of information. Simplify the example metadata for the thesaurus itself... cheers Chaals On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > >Hi all, > >At the SWBPD-WG face-to-face meeting last week, we discussed whether to >initially publish a document that is a very quick and easy guide to >publishing fairly standard thesauri in RDF. Such a document should be of ~3 >page length, and use a concrete example of a thesaurus, already published in >RDF. > >I've put together a draft of such a document on the SkosDev wiki, see: > >[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/PublishingThesauriPrimerToc > >I would also like to suggest that we *do* aim to publish a 'guide' document >for SKOS Core, something like what is at [3], to describe and illustrate the >use of *all* of the features of SKOS Core, and also to discuss some >additional issues.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 17:10:14 UTC