- From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 17:42:28 -0700
- To: "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
> Another point : I'm quite unesay with Approach 2, where the class > "Lion" is defined > completely differently and in a very odd way. How many instances do > you have for this > class? One by distinct subclass? Strange and potentially confusing. > Would not it be better > to have a consistent and as "natural" as possible definition of the > reference ontology > classes (Animal > Lion > African Lion) throughout the approaches, of > which the individual > "Lenny the lion next door" is an instance? Of course, that means > either striking Approach > 2, or have a completely different use case for this approach. I hope my other replies to this thread answered your question. If not, I'll be happy to try again. > Minor point. Seems there is a problem with N3 examples. My browser > don't like them :( In which way? Are these the examples in-line or the links? Could you be more specific? (the ones in-line are simply things with <pre> </pre> . The links are plain text files. Natasha
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2004 20:45:41 UTC