- From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 18:15:52 -0700
- To: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>
People seem to have agreed that doing a pattern on n-ary (reified) relations would be a useful thing to have. Alan Rector and I actually had a chance to work it out and you can see the first draft of our effort at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004May/att-0003/n- aryRelations.html It's nowhere near as complicated or as controversial (we hope) as the Classes as Values one. In fact, it's rather simple, almost too simple to be a pattern. On the other hand, it seems to be on a topic that many newcomers to OWL have questions on. As usual, please feel free to poke holes in it and all feedback is welcome. Thanks in advance, Natasha and Alan
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2004 21:15:48 UTC