- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:26:39 -0400
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
I have created the following URIs for the three proposed OEP Working Drafts. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/n-aryRelations http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ClassesAsValues http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Lists-of-values These are now listed in the Documents section of the WG home page: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/#FreqLinks1 These are intended to be the names of the "latest version" of the editor's drafts. At this moment they are redirects to the following static versions: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/n-aryRelations-20040623/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ClassesAsValues-20040623/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Lists-of-values-20040625/ I recommend that reviewers and comments refer to these versioned URIs when it is important to be explicit about the document version and use the "latest version" URIs when talking generically about the document. These static versions were copied respectively from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0030/n-aryRelations-v2.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0031/ClassesAsValues-v6.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0127.html Alan, your lists-ofvalues-v5.html refers to a non-existent style/guideline.css (not in your zip archive). I have not changed this. I did rename your two .rdf-xml files to .rdf as this is the naming convention our site uses for recognizing content intended to be served as application/rdf+xml -Ralph
Received on Friday, 25 June 2004 09:26:48 UTC