- From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:30:54 +0100
- To: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
At the last telecon I failed to resist the temptation to exploit a little irony and made some facetious remarks that I would now like to clarify. The question in my mind is how strong a hint do we give to the new user over using a particular approach in the ontology patterns notes. I have been thinking that there will be readers who will turn to these notes and want a quick answer on how to do something. These users don't want to evaluate the different options; they just want to get on with it. However, this has to be balanced against the fact that if we make too strong a statement about which approach to take, it might be thought we think we have the power and the wisdom to define what is best practice. An esteemed colleague has pointed out that anything written in a W3C document can be interpretted by some as being normative, the distinction between rec and note not being understood. By chance I was reading a book by Dennet over the weekend where he emphasised that philophers and engineers are responsible not only for what they say, but also for the ways what they say is likely to be misunderstood. Now, I accept that it will not always be appropriate to suggest a single approach, and perhaps the classes as values note is one such case. However, I wonder if we can find a standard form of words that we can use where appropriate to point readers in a hurry to the solution that is likely to be most appropriate for them. Something like perhaps: [[ This document lists a number of solutions to this problem and the reader is advised to read the considerations section of each before deciding which is best for his application. For the reader in a hurry, we suggest that approach X is most likely to be suitable. ]] I am now of the opinion that these hints are a relatively minor service for our readers, so I don't intend to make anything further of this. This suggestion will find favour or not with the editors of the OEP notes. Brian
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 06:32:00 UTC