RE: [WNET] Draft summary of WNET proposal document

A bit of email has crossed in the post on this document.  I've made some
edits to it; nothing particularly substantive - just some tidying up.

Changes:

1) I removed the editors names, apart from Aldo.  This is etiquette of not
putting folks names on documents without their permission.

2) I updated the status section in line with the earlier email discussion.

3) The HTML didn't validate so I tidied it up a little.  In fact, I made
more changes than were strictly necessary to get it to validate; just a
little stylistic tidying up.

Aldo, you may to check you are happy with the mods.

Brian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ralph R. Swick
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:54 PM
> To: Aldo Gangemi
> Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [WNET] Draft summary of WNET proposal document
> 
> 
> At 06:56 PM 7/8/2004 +0200, Aldo Gangemi wrote:
> >Please find a formatted version of the draft summary of the 
> WordNet proposal:
> >
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jul/0020.html
> 
> sigh.  Aldo, I would have preferred you wait a moment so we
> could put this into [1] first rather than into the mail archive.
> 
> In any case, you should have used the text "Editor's Draft"
> rather than "W3C Working Draft" in the title. Jeremy raised this with
> the WG on Tuesday this week [3].
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/Porting-20040708
> [2] http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WD
> [3] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jul/0008.html
> 
> I copied your draft into [1], changing "W3C Working Draft" to 
> "Editor's Draft".
>

Received on Thursday, 8 July 2004 16:44:15 UTC